Sep 13, 2013
neil

Why Steve Jobs wanted you to go to Bible College

You might not think that Steve Jobs would have had much advice to offer on whether or not we should encourage people to attend Bible College. But Daniel Finkelstein, writing in Wednesday’s Times (£), would disagree.  I should make clear that Finkelstein’s piece is on something altogether unrelated to theological education. His is a piece on why the proposed high speed rail link between London and the north is worth the cost despite growing estimates (worth a read for his take on this alone by the way). However, it got me thinking. In his defence of HS2, Finkelstein establishes a principle that can be rightly applied to all sorts of questions including our one on the merits of a Bible college training. Finkelstein argues for what he calls ‘the priority of proximity.’ Put simply, we need to maximise face-time if we are to maximise a learning opportunity.

Finkelstein illustrates his point from Steve Jobs’ demand that the Pixar Animation headquarters should not be a series of small studios but ’one big building with a central atrium.’ Why? Jobs wanted, through architecture, ‘to maximise the number of random encounters’ between employees.

Finkelstein quotes Jobs who says ‘there’s a temptation in our networked age to think that ideas can be developed by e-mail and iChat. That’s crazy. Creativity comes from spontaneous meetings, from random discussions. You run into someone, you ask what they’re doing, you say ‘Wow,’ and soon you’re cooking up all sorts of ideas.’

Something of this dynamic was at work today in two meetings I have been a part of in the last couple of days in which the proximity principle worked  itself out. Both involved considerable travel, commitment, time and energy to attend, but crucially, they provided the only context for a quick-fire exchange of ideas and perspectives that combined to produce exciting results. It simply could not have come about through Skype or an e-mail exchange. It was free-flowing interchange between multiple people that produced the desired and necessary results.

So back to Bible College. Why should you learn in community rather than study through books from a distance or through courses that bring you together on just an occasional basis? Quite simply, because of the priority of proximity. The more learning that is done together, the more you benefit. The cumulative impact of numerous, daily, spontaneous conversations (sometimes in the classroom and sometimes through random encounter) provide the perfect forum for learning. If you want to equip people for ministry build an atrium.

4 Comments

  • what about all those bible colleges that teach “higher criticism”? Do they simply reinforce bad teaching? Isn’t it better for someone to spend face time with God – contemplating His Word?

  • I suppose this argues for full-time Bible College being better than distance learning or part-time study… it also makes the case for studying in your local church context where you’re doing life-on-life on mission together… and that the home is one of the best contexts for discipleship.

  • Having had three years full time in Bible College (WEST) I can agree with this! Some of the most helpful experiences were had in the coffee shop with peers just chatting away. Or other times it was at meal times with a lecturer being able to quiz them on whatever was bothering or puzzling us!

    I also had a bit of a revelation from the Beeston (Nottingham) guys who all work in an office together. The same principle can be applied to church staff. So we’ve just multiplied our staff from 1 to 2, and today is our first day in the office together – so that we’ll have more incidental contact time!

    Anyway, thanks again Neil!

  • [...] a blog post entitled “Why Steve Jobs wanted you to go to Bible College“, Neil Powell applies the same principle to the value that comes from ‘random [...]

Leave a comment

Facebook Twitter RSS Feed